Tax law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Tax law - Case piece of work ExampleJones to change Smithon from a fiscal year end to calendar year end and switch it to an S slew. You asked that I give you definitive answers regarding the outright acquire of Smithon stock, as well as the electric potential difference merger or acquisition of Smithon by Johnson Services. Of these two main issues there are several meek points that need addressed? I will break each section down and answer those questions specifically, definitively responding for each. To be addressed first is, 1. the outright purchase of Smithon stock a. Should you purchase the stock of Smith outright, leaving Smithon entire? What about issuing debt in your Johnson Services company to pay for the Smith Company-would that raise debt to equity issues? It is sometimes better to purchase the stock of Smithon outright, however, in looking at the potential benefit of victimization the assign power of Johnson Services and issuing corporate bonds you would free up the cash inevitable to make changes if they mother a need. on that point is also the added benefit of the debt tax shield. IRC 514 expands on debt-finance income when one uses income gained by borrowing against enthronization property. (IRC 514) Obviously, an issue is the potential problem with debt to equity, however, given the losses posted by Johnson Services recently it seems carpetbag to explore corporate bonds or additional share opportunities and use the cash available to re-tool Smithon. By using the available debt tax shield, you stand to benefit in numerous ways from using Johnson Services as a backer for purchasing Smithon. One potential disadvantage is that issuing debt can increase the take chances of bankruptcy. (Damodaran 9) b. Should I convert Smithon to an S corporation and change the fiscal year end to a calendar year end? c. What potential income tax ramifications exist for me if I purchase the stock of Smithon and convert it to an S corporation? If you use the credit available from Johnson to purchase Smithon it would be beneficial to retain the C experimental condition of that corporation and take full advantage of the corporate tax benefits provideing. However, if you decide to use cash to purchase Smithon and end up with a large personal liability then converting it to S status would engender more beneficial. Due to increased taxes on a personal level with the utilization of mean interrogation it would seem more personally beneficial to retain the C status of the corporation and keep the potential income from that business out of the data included in the mean testing. The income of an S corporation is generally taxed to the shareholders of that corporation rather than the corporation itself. (IRS form 2553 1) As for changing from a fiscal to calendar year end, this would result in filing a short tax year, and additional expenses administratively with no real cabbage benefit. d. Should I merge Johnson Services and Smithon? What ty pe of merger or acquisition would be best (i.e., A type, etc.)? Because there are no available data sets as to the similarities between Smithon Widgets manufacturing and Johnson Services it would be necessary to further explore the ability for both companies to function together. If a merger becomes an option and is pursued successfully the most effective merger type given the information currently available would be the conglomeration merger. This type of merger is between two businesses that are involved in totally unrelated activities. There is the