Dealing with culture Essay

It has al tack together been menti geniusd earlier that for effective apprehension work there must be an great power to at a lower placestand other peoples culture specially that of the enemy. But there is similarly a nonher type of culture that must be addressed and understood it is the culture that exists within the US give-and-take community. It must be made clear though that no arrangement or community does non develop values or norms everyplacenight. This further means that any initiator for change must be ready for the long haul beca subroutine it pass on not a vogue that easily. there is ceaselessly organizational culture, it table services define the company and guides its members on the proper course of action. consort to Amy Zegart the culture that exists within the learning community dirty dog be exposit as parochialism, risk aversion, resistance to change, and that necessitate to k promptly trumps need to lot (2007, p. 64). All of these need to be transformed in order to curb a much improved intelligence community. Coordination The 9/11 walloping as seen in the nine- sensation- 1 report clearly calls for better coordination among the different counter-terror agencies of the US government.This realization leads to the recommendation that for America to be safer there is a with child(p) need for much coordination among the said groups. But as many fox known this is easier said than done. According to Zegart the CIA from the on serve was not really condition the power to coordinate all government agencies related to intelligence sight and as a takings The existence of so many discover agencies and the absence of formal mechanisms to integrate them became reinforced by bureaucratic procedures over time.Throughout the Cold War, different intelligence agencies developed their own budgets and set their own priorities, hired their own staffs and trained them in separate programs, communicated by separate e-mail systems and k ept intelligence in incompatible databases (2007, p. 66). jurisdiction is one of the major stumbling blocks in solving a crime or gathering data. When this term comes up immediately more barriers will bump off up immediately preventing the agency with a significant lead to quest after even further. Now, there is a good explanation for jurisdiction and it is the need for order, focus, and responsibility.But most of the time it solo serves one thing and it is to be sure who to blame when there is a failure in the system. wizard of the painful realizations in 9/11 is the fact that terrorists do not respect jurisdiction, they come and go as they please and successfully utilise the civil liberties offered to individuals living in this country. So a member of a terror group can be living in Asia for one year and whence at the end of that period decides to fly to Los Angeles and then from there move around the country in preparation for a major attack.Who then is in charge to track this guy? sacramental manduction of teaching Aside from the lack of coordination, another related problem is the blind drunk dislike for discipline share-out. And again this is understandable each group is rewarded for their effort. If one has caught a huge quantity of fish by being up all night on a fishing expedition there is no logic to sharing it with others who did not put up the homogeneous effort. On the other hand there are cases wherein the failure of one agency is the failure of all.Take for instance 9/11, there is no use shifting blame or pointing fingers at the CIA because the destruction is snug to the heart of America where everyone is affected. This leads to the argument that education should not be the standard-operating-procedure exactly there are cases where tuition sharing is a must. And one way of doing this is by classifying cases, finding out which one requires the collaboration of those working internationally, on the national level or topical anaes thetic level. Improvements The preceding pages clearly present that there is a need for positive change in the US cognition community.If civilians and those who are from the outside looking in can post signalise observations on areas that needed change then those who are working within the intelligence community are painfully aware of their shortcomings. The next pages will describe the improvements made by various counter-terror groups within the great deal of the federal governing. Need to Share Information One of the areas that requires overhaul is with regards to information sharing. This has not been lost to the analysts and strategists working under the U. S.Department of native land shelter and its think tank the Homeland certificate Advisory Council who proposed the Intelligence and Information Sharing Initiative Homeland Security Intelligence and Information Fusion. The key term here is fusion and this program calls for the managing of flow of information and int elligence across levels and firmaments of government and the private sector to support the rapid assignment of emerging terrorism-related threats and other circumstances requiring intervention by government and private-sector authorities.It is more than the one-time collection of law enforcement and/or terrorism-related intelligence information and it goes beyond establishing an intelligence center or creating a computer network (see Homeland Security Advisory Council). This relatively recent move by the DHS is not only audacious just now introduces how they defend completely acknowledged the error of their ways. thither is no single or central agency that can do all the work when it comes to apprehending terrorists.The lowly policeman may not be wearing fancy suits and may not even pull solve dollar from his work but a police officer does the ill-scented work. The operatives of counter-terror groups may have the firepower and the resources apprehend a terror group but they c an be far away it will take them rare time to leave their offices in and pursue. Whereas the local police department is in close proximity to the terrorist cell and thence there is no conclude why they could not be dispatched to stop the said terror group from executing their plans.To get a better idea with regards to how serious DHS is in improving their capabilities, the anti-terror agency is not only acknowledging the need for sharing information and intelligence but they are likewise admitting that crucial data can come from anywhere. The DHS pointed out the sources of relevant information to be coming from a) Federal b) State c) local d) tribal e) various government entities f) General humankind and g) Private-sector entities. Therefore, there is a great need to improve on the growth of information analysis and information dissemination.The following steps are intentional to jump-start the said process (see Homeland Security Advisory Council) The use of common terminolo gy, definitions, and lexicon by all stakeholders Identifying critical information repositories and establishing the process, protocols, procedures, and technical capabilities to provoke information and/or intelligence from those repositories Understanding and elimination of impediments to information collection and sharing (i. e. , it should be a priority for the Federal Government to go forth State, local, and tribal entities unclassified terrorism-related information) Extensive and continuous interaction with the private sector and with the public at large. The FBI It was conjure uped earlier that in the decades of the 70s and 80s the Federal Bureau of investigating was forced to mellow down its tough investigative stance. The lack of pugnacity was criticized in the aftermath of 9/11. Today rude(a) laws are braggy new life to the FBI invigorating the said agency to pursue pretend terrorists. Aside from the new mandate following 9/11 that chuck up the sponge the FBI to step on the accelerator the President of the United States issued a new directive in 2005 that would forever transform the FBI.On June 28, 2005 the President tell the FBI to create the matter Security Branch within the FBI that will result in, Integrating investigative and intelligence activities against current and emerging national credential threats (see National Security Branch Overview, 2006). This new mandate from the President allows for the asylum of the following a) the FBIs Counterterrorism Division (CTD) b) the Counterintelligence Division (CD) c) the Directorate of Intelligence (DI) and d) the Weapons of mint Destruction Directorate (WMDD).This simply means that the FBI is no longer type as the main investigative body of Federal government it now also functions as counterintelligence and counterterrorism arm of the government as well as the main agency that will handle weapons of mass destruction in the domestic sphere. Conclusion The United States of America, its l eaders and its citizens must come to foothold with its new found status. And it is the sole big businessman in the global arena. There is nothing that comes close to the US in terms of economic and multitude might.This is good news for those who come to enjoy the protection of a superpower a protector who believes in democracy and the rule of law. But this is not a welcome thought for American citizens who are now comprehend as enemies by those who have a sick worldview such as extremists. These fanatics are frighteningly angry at the US and their blabbering and crazed invectives show that they may not be coherent at times but are dead serious in causing harm. The US host is capable pulverizing a small country into smithereens and even able to learn a powerful enemy nation to its knees e.g. Iraq but it does not have the moral authority to simply barge in and decimate surmise enemies. The Federal Government is therefore dependent on an effective and efficacious intelligence gathering arm. It has been shown earlier that it is no longer possible to depose on one single agency to combat terrorism and therefore what is needed is coordination and information sharing. One of the major issues that was resolved was in transaction with a prevailing culture of fragmentation, parochialism, and the insistence of need to know versus sharing of information.After 9/11 it is easy to consider changing interdict attitudes and adopting a new view on coordination and information sharing. Thus, after 9/11 the U. S. Department of Homeland Security was tasked to break down barriers as it has become painfully clear that the lack of coordination was the simple explanation as to why suspected terrorists were able to undergo flight training under the noses of Federal officials. Concrete steps are made to ensure information dissemination as well as the creation of structures and human resources that will be able to analyze data coming from different split of the world.Aside fro m these the U. S. Intelligence community acknowledged the fact that everyone is involved including the State, local and even tribal entities. The big wigs from the Federal Government are also acknowledging the importance of local law enforcement agencies as a deterrent as well as the most effective and efficient aspect of the undivided counter-terrorism apparatus of the US. A welcome development was the strengthening of the capabilities of the CIA and the FBI.Special mention is appropriate for the Presidents directive to vastly improve the ability of the FBI not only as an investigative arm of the Federal Government but also as a counter-intelligence as well as counter-terrorism agency especially when it comes to weapons of mass destruction that could be potentially deployed in the homeland. All of these changes and improvements combined will greatly deter terrorist activity and would help in the speedy arrest as well as dismantlement of terror cells before these groups can wreak havoc in the akin magnitude as September 11, another day that will also live in infamy.References Carafano, J. & M. Sauter (2005). Homeland Security. New York McGraw-Hill. Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2006). National Security Branch Overview. Retrieved 07 February 2008 from http//www. fbi. gov/hq/nsb/whitepaper12-06/whitepaper. pdf. Ganor, B. (2005). The Counter- terrorist act Puzzle A Guide For stopping point Makers. New island of Jersey Transaction Publishers. Hulnick, A. (2004). Keeping Us Safe underground Intelligence and Homeland Security. Westport, CT Praeger Publishers.Paine, T. (2005). Homeland Security The American Tradition. In M. Sauter & J. J. Carafano (Eds. ). Homeland Security. New York The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Perl. R. (2007). Terrorism and National Security Issues and Trends. In A. L. Fitzgerald (Ed. ). Terrorism and National Security. New York Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Posner, R. (2006). Uncertain Shield The U. S. Intelligence system in the Throe s of domesticate. Maryland Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Sands, A. (2005).Integrating Open Sources into Transnational Threat Assessments. In J. E. Sims & B. Gerber (Eds. ). Transforming U. S. Intelligence. Washington, D. C. Georgetown University Press. Sims, J. & B. Gerber. (2005). Transforming U. S. Intelligence. Washington, D. C. Georgetown University Press. The 9/11 Commission Report. Retrieved 08 February 2008 from http//www. 911commission. gov/report/911Report. pdf. Turner, M. (2005). Why Secret Intelligence Fails. Dulles, Virginia Potomac Books, Inc. U. S.Department of Homeland Security. (2005). Intelligence and Information Sharing Initiative Homeland Security Intelligence & Information Fusion. Retrieved 07 February 2008 from http//www. dhs. gov/xlibrary/assets/HSAC_HSIntelInfoFusion_Apr05. pdf . Warner, M. & J. K. McDonald. (2005). US Intelligence Community Reform Studies Since 1947. Washington, D. C. Center for the Study of Intelligence. Zegart, A. (2007). Spying Blind The CIA, the FBI, and the Origins of 9/11. New Jersey Princeton University Press.