Philosophy of language Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Philosophy of language - Es rate ExampleTraditionally, opponents of the CTP have held that the command that appears/seems blushful is reserved for situations in which on that point is reasonable doubt in an individuals look regarding whether something is truly red or otherwise. In that sense, part of the reckoning inherent in that appears/seems red is attributable to the doubt in the speakers mind concerning whether something is red. Consequently, it would be inappropriate, and quite rightly so, to suggest that there is any ounce of doubt regarding whether something is red and it is false that anything appears/looks/seems red when one sees something red. For that reason, critics of the CTP have argued that seeing red cannot be analysed in causal terms, that is, in terms of it being caused to be in a sort in which an entity looks/appears/seems red. In 1961, Herbert Paul Grice, notable for his pioneering work in the philosophy of language, came to the defense of CTP this paper ex plains the mien in which Grice employed his notion of implicature in defense of the Causal Theory of Perception.Grice published an article in which he distinguished between what is meant (what is said) and what is implied (implicated) (Bardzokas 2010, p.114) basically, Grice argues that in saying that appears/seems/looks red, one may implicate that something is not really red but does not out rightly refute that something is red or mean it is not really red. According to Grice, it is actually possible that one who says that looks/seems/appears red sees something red and it could also be that they see something that seems red to them (even if otherwise). If to say that appears red implicates that something may not necessarily be red, it is contradictory to say that appears red, and it is red Grice posits that the implication that a thing is not really red can be explicitly cancelled out. Consequently, if the implicatum of what a speaker says