The Relational Nature of Species Concepts :: Species Positivism Essays

The Relational Nature of Species ConceptsABSTRACT douard Le Roy as early as 1901 observed the existence of an intellectual movement seek to break from traditional positivism and set for himself the task of drawing up the program of this new positivism. Noting that this program precedes the Vienna Circle, I endeavor to check into its nature and to evaluate its impact on logical positivism. Viewed in this light, the discussions among Le Roy, Poincar and Duhem appear more prolonged and substantial than is usually thought. What we countenance here is perhaps not a homogeneous doctrine nevertheless a vigorous intellectual movement, from which logical positivists were able to borrow ad hoc theses in their attempts to mitigate Machs strict positivism more important still, they had in the lead them an example of neopositivism. History is not the only concern among the issues debated, champion encounters the state that facts are theory-laden. This claim still stirs controversy today. An inquiry into the origins of the claim is one way of clarifying the arguments involved.The definition of the thought of a species has been a continual issue in evolutionary biology at least since the outcome of The origin of species (Darwin, 1859). Despite numerous treatments (e.g., Ghiselin, 1974, 1987 Hull, 1976a, 1976b, 1978 Kitcher, 1984 Kitts, 1984 Kitts & Kitts, 1979 Mayr, 1957, 1963, 1976a, 1976b, 1987 Meglitsch, 1954 Mishler & Brandon, 1987 Mishler & Donoghue, 1982 Sober, 1984 Sokal, 1973 Sokal & Crovello, 1970 Wiley, 1978), the species problem still represents a abstract issue.In the present paper, I submit that all species concepts are comparative in nature. In its most general expression, this idea is not new. Indeed, gibe to Mayr (1976a), the species concept is a relational concept (p. 480). However, the interpretation and further shade I propose is different from Mayrs. The crucial difference is that I larn the set-theoretic notion of a relation. A instant o f this adoption is that, in melodic phrase to Mayr, who restricts his idea to the relation of reproductive isolation (which defines his own species concept), I vie that the set-theoretic notion of a relation allows us to define any species concept in terms of some kind of relation. A second consequence has to do with the rejection expressed by Mayr and others towards viewing species as sets. I shall leave something to say about this issue at the end of the paper.The notion of a relation is central to scientific concepts in general, and the species concept is no exception.